- Açıkalın, A. (1989). Özel ve devlet liselerinde veli beklentilerinin örgütsel ve yönetsel boyutları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4, 85-91. [Google Scholar]
- Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2012). Relationship between school administrators’ organizational power sources and teachers' organizational citizenship behaviors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(3), 1843-1852. [Google Scholar]
- Altun, S. A., & Memişoğlu, S. P. (2008). Performans değerlendirmesine ilişkin öğretmen, yönetici ve müfettiş görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 53(53), 7-24. [Google Scholar]
- Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Holloway, J. (2019). Value-added models for teacher evaluation and accountability: Commonsense assumptions. Educational Policy, 33(3), 516-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817719519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Aslan, M., & Ağıroğlu Bakır, A. (2014). Resmi ve özel okul öğretmenlerinin paylaşılan liderliğe ilişkin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 (1), 117-142. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.75431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ayeni, A. J. (2012). Assessment of principals’ supervisory roles for quality assurance in secondary schools in ondo state, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 2(1), 62-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n1p62 [Google Scholar]
- Aypay, A. (2015). Eğitim Politikası. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. [Google Scholar]
- Bacher-Hicks, A., Chin, M. J., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2019). An experimental evaluation of three teacher quality measures: Value-added, classroom observations, and student surveys. Economics of Education Review, 73, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.101919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Balıkçı, A., & Aypay, A. (2018). An investigation of school principalship in the context of bureaucracy. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(11). 1535-1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13395 [Google Scholar]
- Birekul, M. (2018). Özel öğretim kurumlarında okul müdürlerinin liderlik rolleri. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(24), 1652-1671. [Google Scholar]
- Bozan, S., & Ekinci, A. (2017). Okul müdürlerinin öğretmen performans değerlendirme yeterliliklerinin okul müdürleri ve öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(69), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.17755.esosder.412344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Bradford, C. & Braaten, M. (2018). Teacher evaluation and the demoralization of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 130-135. [Google Scholar]
- Cochran-Smith, M., Baker, M., Burton, S., Chang, W. C., Cummings Carney, M., Fernández, M. B., Keefe, E. S., Miller, A. F., & Sánchez, J. G. (2017). The accountability era in US teacher education: Looking back, looking forward. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 572-588. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1385061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Cope, S., Leishman, F., & Starie, P. (1997). Globalization, new public management and the enabling state: Futures of police management. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 10(6), 444-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559710190816 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice. [Google Scholar]
- Cuevas, R., Ntoumanis, N., Fernandez-Bustos, J. G., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being?. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Çimen, B., & Karadağ, E. (2020). Özel okullarda çalışan öğretmenlerin çalışma şartları ve gelecek kaygıları üzerine görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 21(2), 518-541. https://doi.org /10.17679/inuefd.476428 [Google Scholar]
- Çelebi, N., Babaoğlan, E., Selçuk, G., & Peker, S. (2018). Performans değerlendirme formuna ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 211-233. https://doi.org /10.7822/omuefd.425403 [Google Scholar]
- Çevikbaş, R. (2012). Yeni kamu yönetimi anlayışı ve Türkiye uygulamaları. Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1 (2), 9-32. [Google Scholar]
- Dahlstedt, M., & Fejes, A. (2019). Shaping entrepreneurial citizens: A genealogy of entrepreneurship education in Sweden. Critical Studies in Education, 60(4), 462-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1303525 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2018). Teacher evaluation policy tools: Principals’ selective use in instructional leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 568-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1326143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., & Hanna, R. W. (2002). College students' attitudes toward methods of collecting teaching evaluations: In-class versus on-line. Journal of Education for Business, 78(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320209599691 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Donaldson, M. L., & Firestone, W. (2021). Rethinking teacher evaluation using human, social, and material capital. Journal of Educational Change, 1-34. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09405-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Donaldson, M. L., & Woulfin, S. (2018). From tinkering to going “rogue”: How principals use agency when enacting new teacher evaluation systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 531-556. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718784205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Dyke, M., Harding, A., & Liddon, S. (2008). How can online observation support the assessment and feedback, on classroom performance, to trainee teachers at a distance and in real time?. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701781432 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ehren, M., & Perryman, J. (2018). Accountability of school networks: Who is accountable to whom and for what? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 942-959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717272 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Erdağ, C., & Karadağ, E. (2017). Öğretmenler ve okul müdürleri perspektifinden okul hesap verebilirliği politikaları. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(13), 459-496. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.292614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Erdoğan, İ. (2002). Yeni bir binyıla doğru Türk eğitim sistemi: Sorunlar ve çözümler. Ankara: Sistem Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
- Erichsen, K., & Reynolds, J. (2020). Public school accountability, workplace culture, and teacher morale. Social Science Research, 85, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Espinoza, O. (2017). Paulo Freire’s ideas as an alternative to higher education neo-liberal reforms in Latin America. Journal of Moral Education, 46(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1363601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ferguson, R. F. (2012). Can student surveys measure teaching quality?. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 24-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Figlio, D. N. (1997). Teacher salaries and teacher quality. Economics Letters, 55(2), 267-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00070-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Finefter-Rosenbluh, I. (2020). ‘Try walking in my shoes’: teachers’ interpretation of student perception surveys and the role of self-efficacy beliefs, perspective taking and inclusivity in teacher evaluation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(6), 747-769. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1770692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1094144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ford, T. G., Urick, A., & Wilson, A. S. P. (2018). Exploring the effect of supportive teacher evaluation experiences on U.S. teachers’ job satisfaction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(59). 1-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.3559 [Google Scholar]
- Ford, T. G., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. C. (2017). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment, and high-stakes teacher evaluation policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy, 31(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815586855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Frase, L. E. (1989). Effects of teacher rewards on recognition and job enrichment. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(1), 52-57. [Google Scholar]
- Fusarelli, L. D. & Johnson, B. (2004). Educational governance and the new public management. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 9(2), 118-127. [Google Scholar]
- Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transperancy and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Grissom, J. A. & Bartanen, B. (2019). Strategic retention: Principal effectiveness and teacher turnover in multiple-measure teacher evaluation systems. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 514-555. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218797931 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Guarino, C. M., Reckase, M. D., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Can value-added measures of teacher performance be trusted? Education Finance and Policy, 10(1), 117-156. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Gümrükçüoğlu, Y. B. (2016). 5580 sayılı özel öğretim kurumları kanunu kapsamında yapılan zincirleme iş sözleşmesinin sona ermesinde kıdem tazminat. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası, 74, 223-249. [Google Scholar]
- Hesapçıoğlu, M., & Nohutçu, A. (1999). Velîlerin özel okul tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler ve özel okulların reklam stratejileri. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(11), 183-202. [Google Scholar]
- Holloway, J., Sørensen, T. B., & Verger, A. (2017). Global perspectives on high-stakes teacher accountability policies: An introduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(85), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3325 [Google Scholar]
- Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, G. C. (2010). Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama. (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel. [Google Scholar]
- Hvidston, D. J., McKim, C. A., & Mette, I. M. (2016). Principals' supervision and evaluation cycles: perspectives from principals. Education Leadership Review, 17(1), 100-113. [Google Scholar]
- Ingersoll, R. M., & Collins, G. J. (2017). Accountability and control in American schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1205142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Iroegbu, E. E., & Etudor-Eyo, E. (2016). Principals’ instructional supervision and teachers’ effectiveness. British Journal of Education, 4(7), 99-109. [Google Scholar]
- Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101-136. [Google Scholar]
- Kallio, K. M., & Kallio, T. J. (2014). Management-by-results and performance measurement in universities–implications for work motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 574-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Kantos, Z. E. (2013). Performans değerlendirme süreci ve 360 derece geri bildirim sistemi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama Dergisi, 12(23), 59-76. [Google Scholar]
- Karaköse, T., & Kocabaş, İ. (2006). Özel ve devlet okullarında öğretmenlerin beklentilerinin iş doyumu ve motivasyon üzerine etkileri. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(1), 3-14. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J. (2018). School accountability and standard-based education reform: The recall of social efficiency movement and scientific management. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.11.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Kocabaş, İ., & Karaköse, T. (2005). Okul müdürlerinin tutum ve davranışlarının öğretmenlerin motivasyonuna etkisi (özel ve devlet okulu örneği). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 79-93. [Google Scholar]
- Konan, N., & Yılmaz, S. (2018). Öğretmen performans değerlendirmeye ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri: Bir karma yöntem araştırması. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 219, 137-160. [Google Scholar]
- Kulaksızoğlu, A., Çakar, M., & Dilmaç, B. (1999). Türkiye'de ve dünyada özel okulların yapısı ve işleyişi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(11), 219-232. [Google Scholar]
- Kurt, M., & Uğurlu, Ö. Y. (2007). Yeni kamu yönetimi ve yeni kamu yönetimi yaklaşımının gelişiminde Avrupa birliğinin rolü: İlerleme raporlarının içerik analizi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi, İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 9 (2), 81-109. [Google Scholar]
- Lavigne, A. L., & Chamberlain, R. W. (2017). Teacher evaluation in Illinois: School leaders’ perceptions and practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(2), 179-209. https://doi.org/87-109. 10.1007/s11092-016-9250-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Lavy, V. (2007). Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. The Future of Children, 17(1), 87-109. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, J. (2015). Live video classroom observation: an effective approach to reducing reactivity in collecting observational information for teacher professional development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(3), 235-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1045314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Lillejord, S., Elstad, E. & Kavli, H. (2018). Teacher evaluation as a wicked policy problem. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1429388 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Liu, S., Xu, X., & Stronge, J. H. (2016). Chinese middle school teachers’ preferences regarding performance evaluation measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9237-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Looney, J. (2011). Developing high‐quality teachers: Teacher evaluation for improvement. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 440-455. [Google Scholar]
- Loyalka, P., Sylvia, S., Liu, C., Chu, J., & Shi, Y. (2019). Pay by design: Teacher performance pay design and the distribution of student achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(3), 621-662. https://doi.org/10.1086/702625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault's panopticon revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234. [Google Scholar]
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2020). Retrieved from (20. 04.2021) https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_09/04144812_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2019_2020.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Mohrman Jr, A. M., Mohrman, S. A., & Odden, A. R. (1996). Aligning teacher compensation with systemic school reform: Skill-based pay and group-based performance rewards. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(1), 51-71. [Google Scholar]
- Moran, R. M. (2017). The impact of a high stakes teacher evaluation system: Educator perspectives on accountability. Educational Studies, 53(2), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1283319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Murray, H. G. (1997). Does evaluation of teaching lead to improvement of teaching?. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2(1), 8-23. [Google Scholar]
- Nartgün, Ş., & Kaya, A. (2016). Özel okul velilerinin beklentileri doğrultusunda okul imajı oluşturma. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (2), 153-167. [Google Scholar]
- Neuman, L. W. (2010). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (Çev. S. Özge). İstanbul: Yayın Odası. [Google Scholar]
- Orphanos, S. (2014). What matters to principals when they evaluate teachers? Evidence from Cyprus. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ozga, J. (2013). Accountability as a policy technology: accounting for education performance in Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 292-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Özdemir, A., & Tüysüz, F. (2017). Özel okul yatırımları için Türkiye’deki 81 ilin çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile stratejik analizi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 45, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.29529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Özer, M. A. (2005). Günümüzün yükselen değeri: Yeni kamu yönetimi. Sayıştay Dergisi, 59, 3-46. [Google Scholar]
- Öztaş, N., & Gürcüoğlu, S. (2018). Türk kamu yönetiminde performans yönetimi: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(14), 537-549. [Google Scholar]
- Page, D. (2017). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1209566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Parlar, H. (2006). Velilerin özel okul tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler ve özel okulların durumu: Kahramanmaraş örneği (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul. [Google Scholar]
- Paufler, N. A., King, K. M., & Zhu, P. (2020). Promoting professional growth in new teacher evaluation systems: Practitioners’ lived experiences in changing policy contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Perry-Hazan, L., & Birnhack, M. (2019). Caught on camera: Teachers’ surveillance in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Podgursky, M. J., & Springer, M. G. (2007). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909-949. [Google Scholar]
- Press, F., Woodrow, C., Logan, H., & Mitchell, L. (2018). Can we belong in a neo-liberal world? Neo-liberalism in early childhood education and care policy in Australia and New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 19(4), 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949118781909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Range, B. G., Scherz, S., Holt, C. R., & Young, S. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(3), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Reid, D. B. (2019). What information do principals consider when evaluating teachers? School Leadership and Management, 39(5), 457-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1576167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Reinhorn, S. K., Johnson, S. M., & Simon, N. S. (2017). Investing in development: Six high-performing, high-poverty schools implement the Massachusetts teacher evaluation policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(3), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717690605 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Sağbaş, N. Ö., & Özkan, C. (2019). 360 derece performans değerlendirme sistemine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama, 2(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar]
- Sever, M., & Aypay, A. (Ed.) (2014). Öğretmenlik halleri: Türkiye’de öğretmen olmak üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Ankara: PEGEM [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, S., Yusoff, M., Kannan, S., & Baba, S. B. (2011). Concerns of teachers and principals on instructional supervision in three Asian countries. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(3), 214-217. [Google Scholar]
- Springer, M. G., & Gardner, C. D. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: Context, status, and direction. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(8), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009100803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Steinberg, M. P., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). The sensitivity of teacher performance ratings to the design of teacher evaluation systems. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 378-396. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Storey, A. (2002). Performance management in schools: could the balanced scorecard help?. School Leadership & Management, 22(3), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363243022000020435 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Su, Y., Feng, L., & Hsu, C. H. (2017). Accountability or authenticity? The alignment of professional development and teacher evaluation. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 717-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1255189 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Şişman, M. (2011). Eğitimde mükemmellik arayışı: Etkili okullar. Ankara: Pegem. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, E. (2010). I spy with my little eye: the use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. The Sociological Review, 58(3), 381-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01930.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Taylor, E. (2011). UK schools, CCTV and the Data Protection Act 1998. Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.493226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Taylor, E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628-51. https://doi.org/ 10.1257/aer.102.7.3628 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Topçu, İ. (2010). Devlet ve özel ilköğretim okullarında yöneticilerin öğretimin denetimi görevlerini yerine getirme biçimleri. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 34(2), 31-39. [Google Scholar]
- Topuz, M., & Yılmaz, K. (2019). Okul müdürleri ve öğretmenlerin performans değerlendirme süreci hakkındaki görüşleri: Nitel bir araştırma. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 82-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2019.92.3 [Google Scholar]
- Torrance, H. (2017). Blaming the victim: Assessment, examinations, and the responsibilisation of students and teachers in neo-liberal governance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1104854 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Uygun, S. (2003). Türkiye'de dünden bugüne özel okullara bir bakış (gelişim ve etkileri). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 107-120. [Google Scholar]
- Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hämäläinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2004). Pressures, rewards and teacher retention: A comparative study of primary teaching in England and Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(2), 169-188. [Google Scholar]
- Woessmann, L. (2011). Cross-country evidence on teacher performance pay. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 404-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Yariv, E. (2009). The appraisal of teachers’ performance and its impact on the mutuality of principal-teacher emotions. School Leadership and Management, 29(5), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430903152302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar]
- Yılmaz, V., & Turan, A. (2019). Kamuda performans yönetiminin önemi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33(46), 313-342. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
|