PEN Academic Publishing   |  ISSN: 1949-4270   |  e-ISSN: 1949-4289

Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2018, Vol. 13(2) 104-127

Investigation of School Readiness and Academic Development of Elementary Students Firstly Enrolled at School with '4+4+4 Education Regulation' in Turkey

Ali Ekber Şahin & Çiğdem İş Güzel

pp. 104 - 127   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2018.143.6   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1801-23-0003.R1

Published online: July 23, 2018  |   Number of Views: 78  |  Number of Download: 245


Abstract

Setting the age for starting elementary students at 60 months old has been a hotly debated topic in Turkey since the Grand National Assembly passed an education reform bill as Law No. 6287, known to the public as the “4+4+4 regulation.” At the outset of its implementation, students who started first grade in school year 2012–2013 had an age distribution in the range of 60 to 84 months. The present research aimed to determine the effect of this age difference among students in the same grade level on their subsequent development. Thus, the study is a longitudinal and causal comparative research since comparison of the two age groups on both readiness for the school and the academic development throughout the four assessments within six months intervals was investigated. The results indicated that students younger than 69 months are disadvantaged against their older peers in all the specified fields and subfields during all the periods studied.

Keywords: Academic development, Academic success, Age Distribution, 4+4+4 educational regulation, School readiness


How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Sahin, A.E. & Guzel, C.I. (2018). Investigation of School Readiness and Academic Development of Elementary Students Firstly Enrolled at School with '4+4+4 Education Regulation' in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(2), 104-127. doi: 10.29329/epasr.2018.143.6

Harvard
Sahin, A. and Guzel, C. (2018). Investigation of School Readiness and Academic Development of Elementary Students Firstly Enrolled at School with '4+4+4 Education Regulation' in Turkey. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(2), pp. 104-127.

Chicago 16th edition
Sahin, Ali Ekber and Cigdem Is Guzel (2018). "Investigation of School Readiness and Academic Development of Elementary Students Firstly Enrolled at School with '4+4+4 Education Regulation' in Turkey". Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 13 (2):104-127. doi:10.29329/epasr.2018.143.6.

References
  1. Arıkan, S. (2008). Cognitive development application in the Cito Turkey student monitoring system (SMS). Cito Education: Theory and Practice, Introduction Issue, 1, 27–31.
  2. Arıkan, S., & Berberoğlu, G. (2013). Analysis of cognitive development application regarding cultural affinity. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 20, 9–16.
  3. Aybek, B., & Aslan, S. (2015). Analysis of opinions of elementary school grade one teachers on the problems encountered in the 4+4+4 discontinuous compulsory education system and solution suggestions. Pegem Education and Teaching Journal, 5, 237–346.
  4. Aykaç, N., Kabaran, H., Atar, E., & Bilgin, H. (2014). Evaluation of problems encountered by elementary school grade one students as a result of the 4+4+4 education system, based on the opinions of teachers. Turkish Studies, 9, 335–348.
  5. Başar, M. (2013). Evaluation of personal self-care and first reading-writing skills of students starting elementary school at age 60-66 months, based on opinions of teachers. Turkish Studies, 8, 241–252.
  6. Bavlı, B., & Aydın, H. (2015). Primary school teachers’ views on compulsory education (4+4+4): a sample of Bayrampasa District. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7, 84–94.
  7. Berberoğlu, G. (2009). Material mapping method and determining proficiency levels in the Cito Turkey student monitoring system (SMS). Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 3, 13–24.
  8. Berberoğlu, G. (2012). Scope validity. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 15, 9–16.
  9. Berberoğlu, G., İş Güzel, Ç., & Toker, N. (2011). Vertical expression of proficiency definitions in the student monitoring system. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 13, 9–12.
  10. Boz, T., & Yıldırım, A. (2014). Difficulties encountered by grade one teachers in the 4+4+4 education system. Başkent University, Education Faculty Journal, 1, 54–65.
  11. Brown, C. G., McGuire, D. B., Beck, S. L., Peterson, D. E., & Mooney, K. H. (2007). Visual graphical analysis: A technique to investigate symptom trajectories over time. Nursing Research, 56, 195–201. 
  12. Calp, Ş., & Calp, M. (2015). The 4+4+4 education system from the perspective of the branch and elementary teachers. Turkish Studies, 10, 383–406.
  13. Cito Turkey. (2013). Cito Türkiye tanıtım kitapçığı [Cito Turkey introductory booklet]. Ankara, Turkey: Cito Yayınları. 
  14. Cito Turkey. (2015a). Cito Türkiye BG uygulama kılavuzu [Cito Turkey CD application guide]. Ankara, Turkey: Cito Yayınları.
  15. Cito Turkey. (2015b). Cito Türkiye A-ÖİS yeterlik kitapçığı [Cito Turkey A-PMS proficiency booklets]. Ankara, Turkey: Cito Yayınları. 
  16. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
  17. Doğan, S., Demir, S. B., & Pınar, M. A. (2014). Evaluation of the 4+4+4 discontinuous compulsory education according to the opinions of elementary teachers. Elementary Education Online, 13, 503–517.
  18. Epçaçan, C. (2015). Opinions of elementary and middle school teachers on the 4+4+4 education system regarding certain variables. Turkish Studies, 10, 387–408.
  19. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2008). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  20. Gay, L., Mills. G., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. New York: Prentice Hall.
  21. Goodlad, J. I., & Anderson, R. H. (1987). The non-graded elementary school. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Press. 
  22. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1988). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  23. İş Güzel, Ç. (2008). The structure of the mathematics field in the Cito Turkey student monitoring system (SMS). Cito Education: Theory and Practice, Introduction 1, 32–36.
  24. İş Güzel, Ç. (2009). Measuring problem-solving skills in the Cito Turkey student monitoring system (SMS) and sampling and evaluation with activities and questions. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 4, 9–20.
  25. İş Güzel, Ç., & Berberoğlu, G. (2013). What are the skills that students should gain in the Turkish education system? Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 19, 9–16.
  26. İş Güzel, Ç., Şahin, A. E, & Konak, Ö. A. (2014). Analysis of the readiness levels and score averages of students starting school at different ages in the 4+4+4 system. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 26, 9–22.
  27. Konak, Ö. A., Berberoğlu, G., Arıkan, S., Özgen Tuncer, Ç., & İş Güzel, Ç. (2010). Cognitive and language skill under school readiness. Cito Education: Theory and Practice, 8, 9–20.
  28. Külekçi, E. (2013). Evaluation of the opinions of teachers on the unified class practice under the 4+4+4 education system. Education and Teaching-Research Journal, 2, 369–77.
  29. Long, J. D. (2012). Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  30. MEB İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği [MONE Elementary Institution Regulation]. (2003). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 25212, 27 Ağustos 2003. [T.R. Official Gazette No. 25212, 27 August 2003].
  31. MEB Okul Öncesi Eğitim ve İlköğretim Kurumları Yönetmeliği [MONE Preschool and Elementary Institution Regulation]. (2012). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 28360, 21 Temmuz 2012. [T.R. Official Gazette No. 28360, 21 July 2012].
  32. Özden, B., Kılıç, R., & Aksu, D. (2014). Opinions of elementary teachers on 12 years (4+4+4) compulsory education. Uşak University Social Sciences Journal, 7, 181–202.
  33. Özenç, M., & Çekirdekçi, S. (2013). Opinions of teachers regarding problems encountered by students (60-69-month-old) in the pre-school period, enrolled in grade one of elementary school. Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal, 13, 177–192.
  34. Öztürk, E., & Uysal, K. (2013). Comparison of reading-writing processes of elementary school grade one student regarding calendar age. Turkish Studies, 8, 1041–154.
  35. Peker-Ünal, D. (2013). Opinions of elementary teachers on the 4+4+4 regulation. Education and Teaching-Research Journal, 2, 324–337.
  36. Saldanã, J. (2003). Longitudinal qualitative research: Analyzing change through time. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. 
  37. Sezginsoy-Şeker, B. (2015). The evaluation of 1st-grade school teachers’ views about orientation and preparation programs. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5, 19–37.
  38. UNICEF (2012). School readiness and transition. New York: UNESCO.
  39. Uzun, E. M., & Alat, K. (2014). Opinions of elementary school grade one teachers on the 4+4+4 education system and readiness of students who are starting school after this system. Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty Journal, 14, 15–44.
  40. Ünver, G. B., Dikbayır, A., & Yurdakul, B. (2014). Analysis of discontinuous compulsory education elementary school grade one practices. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23, 1647–1664.
  41. Van Ness, P. H., Fried, T. R., & Gill, T. M. (2011). Mixed methods for the interpretation of longitudinal gerontologic data: Insights from philosophical hermeneutics. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 293–308.
  42. World Bank. (2015). Official entrance age to primary education. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.AGES